By Abdul Azeez sulaiman.
Okay! if you had not done it, let me give you another two
similar questions to alleviate any difficulty or complexity
you might have encountered.
v I had saw
my result
v Adio
have
went to school.
You see! the sentences were even illogical to your brain
because of the wrong uses of verbs.
As this verb is blessed with three forms in expressing tense
and two in expressing number, it is worthy of mentioning that it also has some
unique rules and regulations that distinct it from other verbs.
Starting with the form in tenses and numbers.
There is “have” which serves as the bare
infinitive of the verb. In terms of number, it is only used for plural subject,
and in tense, it is only used for simple present participle.
Take for example,
v 1.
We have
bought the long man dictionary.
v 2.
They have
killed the blasphemer.
See these also,
v Lekan
has
eaten his meat.
v Moshood
has
written a book.
The third is “had”.
It is usually used in a sentence that comprises two clauses.
One as a main clause and the second as a dependent clause. In tense, it is the
past tense of both has and have. As it can be used for a singular subject, it
can also be used for the plural one.
Example:
v They
had gone
before we arrived.
They had gone is a clause. it is the main clause. Before we
arrived is another clause. It is the dependent clause. It is called that
because it depends on the main clause–and
without the main clause, it couldn't make any sense.
Another example.
v He had eaten
before you called us.
You can also see that we used it for both plural and
singular subject.
Now let's move to its rules and regulations.
The first rule is that, any verb that precedes the “to-have” verb must be in its past
participle form.
Take for instance,
v Ade has bought
a new phone.
Bought is the verb that precedes has and because of the laid
down law, it is in its past participle form.
v They
have
slaughtered our ram.
Slaughtered is the verb that precedes have and it is in its
past participle form for that.
Note that The have verb rigidfy this law to the extent that
its negativity form must also follow it.
For example.
v Ade haven't
seen the man not see.
v They
have not
killed the rat not kill.
Hopefully! you have grasped it.
Now let's use this explanation to answer the first question.
The question says “I
have ate the food”
The answer would be “I
have eaten the food”
Ate is the simple past tense of the verb “eat”
and the requirement of “to-have” verb
is eaten which is the past participle of eat. Do you get it?
Base on what we have said on the uses of had. It is mainly
used for sentence of two clauses.
So for this, had would have to be changed to have.
now it will be “I
have done the work”.
Now I believe you have had the full grasp of it. Here are
more examples to test your understanding. Do it and give the answer in the
reply box.
« He have
killed the rat.
« They
has
took the girl.
« The
lecturer has saw his matric
number.
« The
rain has
swell the dead rat.
« I have fasten my seatbelt.
0 Comments